Thursday, December 23, 2010

When will states get due respect?


At the stroke of midnight on august 15th 1947, british relinquished India. Despite the jubilation, deep within was a country deeply divided. The british policy of promoting sub national identities to keep a check on growing nationalism left a deep scar on Indian society. Independent India was characterised by a stagnant economy with large spread regional disparity.
Economic growth was seen only in and around Delhi, Kolkatta and Mumbai. This was because of the British administration’s trade policy, land tenure system and selective public investment. Hence one of key objectives of independent idea was to bridge the disparities. Since then all five year plans have focused on bringing about balanced regional development .
Till the 4th five year plan India followed a strategy of
i) Priority to agriculture, irrigation, community development and other activities which could stimulate rural economy
ii) Equitable development of infrastructure
iii) Establishment of new enterprises with a focus on addressing regional disparity
All these were long term goals and their results could only be seen only after a decade. In the short term government increased its public expenditure. But this expenditure was concentrated on development of non agriculture sector. The government followed a policy of non intervention with respect to agriculture sector while on the other hand it played the rĂ´le of facilitator in non agriculture sector.
This policy resulted India development of new urban centers around the enterprises and industrial clusters. The repercussions of neglecting agriculture sector came to the fore in 1960s when there was an acute shortage of food. This forced the government to focus on agriculture development which lead to the green revolution. Green revolution supposedly transformed India from a ship to mouth nation into a food surplus country. This is a flawed analysis. What green revolution did was , it concentrated on areas that
A) already had substantial agriculture and irrigation facilities
B) was free form zamindari system
This was the reason why the impact of green revolution was felt mostly in the northwest India. Green revolution never made India a self sufficient country. Its aim was only to provide food to all those who could buy but not food for all. This is the reason why we still have over 30% people struggling for even a square meal a day.
Following the green revolution, another major turn around in India’s sojourn was the liberalisation in 1990s. It was projected as a leap for India’s economy and its benefits would percolate to all sections and regions of society and thereby reduce disparity. On the contrary it widened the disparity and increased competition within the state. The growth of myriad regional parties bears testimony to the fact that people had become restless with the elitist policies of central government. The rich states got richer while poor states became poorer. The rich states with their surplus were able to provide incentives to private investors and hence reaped the benefits of liberalisation.
This indicates a clear dominance of central government in economic policy making. This has widened the disparity. This disparity may soon threaten the federal structure of our nation. It is high time that central government starts respecting federalism and give states the due respect.

Thursday, October 14, 2010

Geography

Geography
Advantage of strategic location of India in the indian ocean
1. India’s long coastline of over 7000 Km gives it a large exclusive economic zone rich in oil,gas and mineral resources
2. India’s strategic location in indian ocean enables it to oversee security over a wide area. This makes india a necessity for many a regional groupings like ASEAN, SAARC etc. Many nations collaborate with indian navy in conducting anti piracy operation
3. India’ position in the indian ocean overlooking key international transport routes giving india leverage in various summits
4. India’s coastal zone being within the tropics gives it a rich bio diversity making them rich spots for eco tourism
5. It gives india sites for all weather ports and hence helps in boosting India’s overseas trade
6. The long coastline benefits us by providing space for coastal shipping which is a cheaper mode of transport for certain goods and has a key role to play in case of emergencies
7. The coastlines provide sites for tapping oceano thermal, tidal, wave and other non conventional energies

Monday, September 27, 2010

Role of CAG- Public administration & GS

Auditing is the task of counterchecking accounts. In india the auditing of government audits is done by comptroller auditor general as provided under article 148. Auditing is a legislative functions. Hence comptroller auditor general is an agent of parliament. He is appointed by president and submits the report to the president. CAG is responsible for auditing of
a. Central government accounts
b. State government accounts
c. Central public sector undertaking
d. State public sector undertaking
e. Public corporations
f. Joint stock companies ie PPPs
g. Consolidated fund of india
h. Contingency fund of india
i. Public accounts
CAG can perform the following types of audits
a. Revenue audit: It involves auditing the income of a department
b. Expenditure audit: It involves auditing the expenditure of public money by a department
c. Properietary audit: It involves auditing the expenditure of parliament granted funds of a department
d. Stores and stocks audit: It is the physical verification of assets
e. Efficiency audit: It examines the benefits accrued from the expenditure made
CAG audits accounts that he receives from Comptroller general of accounts. The audit report is forwarded to the president. The president forwards it to the parliament. The task of auditing being a legislative task is primarily to be undertaken by parliament. But since the parliamentarians lack the technical knowhow to conduct an audit, CAG conducts the audit on their behalf. The audit report is handed over to the public accounts committee in parliament. The CAG aids the committee in analysing the report in following ways
• Whom to examine?
• What to examine?
• How to examine?
• Suggest actions to be taken
• Helps in analysis of action taken report
Through these functions CAG acts as a friend, philosopher, guide of public accounts committee.
CAG also plays the role of watch dog of public purse by keeping a vigilant watch on the expenditure made by public servants. CAG at times has also played the role of a blood hound. When CAG’s requests werent heeded to by public servants, CAG personally investigated and gathered evidences for example in the bihar fodder scam, coffin scam of kargil etc.
CAG in india suffers from the lack of authority. CAG doesn’t have the authority to demand for infroamtion from public officials. It is through the PAC that he exercises authority. Depsite these flaws CAG has played a key role in governance in our country. Many a miscrepancies have been brought to light in recent times due to the watchful eyes of CAG.

Wednesday, September 22, 2010

India-China still brothers?

Hindi chini bhai bhai was a famous slogan of yesteryears. Now this brotherhood seems to be missing between the two. Interestingly both the nations were born around the same time and their growth trajectory has been more or less identical. China as a nation firmly established itself in 1949 and India immediately embraced it as a loving neighbour. China however started irritating its big bro(India). It published in its maps a large section of indian territory as its own. However when big bro asked for clarification, it claimed that the maps were of 1912 and necessary corrections would be made. That turned out to be lie and very soon it formalised the maps and waged a war to occupy its claimed territories. The big brother’s trust in china was shattered and both parted ways after war never to talk with each other again for a decade. Meanwhile china decided to launch an economic attack on india by growing into an economic superpower. In this endeavour the communist china opened up its country for the capitalists in 1970s.
While India lurched into dark days of emergency where all economic activity came to standstill, china began growing into an economically stable nation. India after the BoP shock of 1990 embarked on economic reforms and opened up its market for the foreign capital. Very soon we reached a respectable stage on world economic stage and began sharing space with big wigs like US and UK. China had already firmly established its position. In 2000, one of the fine statesman of our times Shri Vajpayee embarked on a tour of china and that visit proved to be an ice breaker. Major decisions were made on border dispute, trade , technology etc. Very soon the camarederie grew and now they are the two biggest economic powers in asia. However india china interests are blurred. On some issues like climate change and global economic reforms we share a great rapport with china. This partnership managed to put across asia’s views effectively at copenhagen and other important summits. We seem to behave politely and formally on the global stage but in our backyard the scenario hasn’t changed much.
China with its string of pearls startegy is trying to tie down india’s growing influence over south asia. With India’s growing relations with US, china has been trying to counterbalance it by firming up its relationship with pak and russia. Particularly china’s relationship with pak is going to hurt india dearly. India despite its growing economic power has unfortunately not been able to influence its neighbur’s to the extent that china ahs influenced. India has a growing trust and trade deficit with its neighbours. Our fixxation with pakistan over the years has resulted in neglect of our other neighbours while china has been benevolent with all of India’s neighbours and managed to leverage its economic power to forge relationship with them.
With both china and India bound to grow in future , their interests are increasingly becoming orthogonal. In this time of economoic prosperity of the two antions the last thing that we need is a war. It is high time that the two brothers forget the past and reconcile. India should shed all its inhibitions and get down to a frank talk with china. Post the economic crisis, the world is wary of US as a leader and is waiting for a new leader to lead it. An India-china partnership can prove to be a worthy leader to the world and transform the 21st century into an asian century.

India-China still brothers?

Hindi chini bhai bhai was a famous slogan of yesteryears. Now this brotherhood seems to be missing between the two. Interestingly both the nations were born around the same time and their growth trajectory has been more or less identical. China as a nation firmly established itself in 1949 and India immediately embraced it as a loving neighbour. China however started irritating its big bro(India). It published in its maps a large section of indian territory as its own. However when big bro asked for clarification, it claimed that the maps were of 1912 and necessary corrections would be made. That turned out to be lie and very soon it formalised the maps and waged a war to occupy its claimed territories. The big brother’s trust in china was shattered and both parted ways after war never to talk with each other again for a decade. Meanwhile china decided to launch an economic attack on india by growing into an economic superpower. In this endeavour the communist china opened up its country for the capitalists in 1970s.
While India lurched into dark days of emergency where all economic activity came to standstill, china began growing into an economically stable nation. India after the BoP shock of 1990 embarked on economic reforms and opened up its market for the foreign capital. Very soon we reached a respectable stage on world economic stage and began sharing space with big wigs like US and UK. China had already firmly established its position. In 2000, one of the fine statesman of our times Shri Vajpayee embarked on a tour of china and that visit proved to be an ice breaker. Major decisions were made on border dispute, trade , technology etc. Very soon the camarederie grew and now they are the two biggest economic powers in asia. However india china interests are blurred. On some issues like climate change and global economic reforms we share a great rapport with china. This partnership managed to put across asia’s views effectively at copenhagen and other important summits. We seem to behave politely and formally on the global stage but in our backyard the scenario hasn’t changed much.
China with its string of pearls startegy is trying to tie down india’s growing influence over south asia. With India’s growing relations with US, china has been trying to counterbalance it by firming up its relationship with pak and russia. Particularly china’s relationship with pak is going to hurt india dearly. India despite its growing economic power has unfortunately not been able to influence its neighbur’s to the extent that china ahs influenced. India has a growing trust and trade deficit with its neighbours. Our fixxation with pakistan over the years has resulted in neglect of our other neighbours while china has been benevolent with all of India’s neighbours and managed to leverage its economic power to forge relationship with them.
With both china and India bound to grow in future , their interests are increasingly becoming orthogonal. In this time of economoic prosperity of the two antions the last thing that we need is a war. It is high time that the two brothers forget the past and reconcile. India should shed all its inhibitions and get down to a frank talk with china. Post the economic crisis, the world is wary of US as a leader and is waiting for a new leader to lead it. An India-china partnership can prove to be a worthy leader to the world and transform the 21st century into an asian century.

Monday, September 13, 2010

Tax reforms

Tax Reforms
Why tax reforms?
India after independence decided to tread the socialist path and govt took upon itself the onerous task of wiping the tears of the poor. However in its effort towards delivering services to all and ensuring equitable growth, its expenditure on social sector shot up. It established numerous public sector industries to manufacture goods right from bread to ambassdor. All these resulted in heavy spending. However governments revenues remained weak. One of the main source of government revenues are tax revenues. Tax revenue was alarmingly low because of the regressive tax structure we had. This called for a tax policy reform. Finally the fiscal crisis of 1990 forced us to unlash a series of reforms in our economy popularly known as LPG(Liberalisation, privitisation, globalisation) reforms.
The tax policy pre 1991 suffered from following drawbacks
• It was retrogressive ie it taxed both the poor and rich equally. Majority of government revenue was from indirect taxes. Indirect taxes like excise duty , custom duty don’t differentiate between rich and poor
• It was irrational with tax rates going up as high aas 97.6%(i.e. for every 100 rs earned 97.6 rs goes to govt)!!!
• Irrational policies discouraged people from paying taxes and lead to tax evasion
• The more the rules, the more the loop holes. With so many rules in the income tax act people with help of their chartered accountants could easily exploit the loop holes and thus managed to legally avoid tax
• All this lead to a huge fiscal deficit for government which mad eit imperative on govt to undertake tax policy teforms
What were the tax policy reforms?
The need for tax policy reforms was
• To improve tax to GDP ratio
• To progressively tax people ie tax the rich more and the poor less
• To increase revenue from direct taxes
• To improve the fiscal balance of govt
• To lower tax rates and widen tax base
Keeping these objectives in view MMS formulated a meticulous fiscal policy which worked wonders for our country.
He undertook following steps
• Earlier cotton cloth was subjected to 50 different tax rates depending upon quality of cotton. Such multiplicity of rates resulted ina dministrative complexity. This was borugh down to a uniform single rate called CENVAT
• Earlier our tax dept spend rs 1.2 per rupee to collect Tax!!! By leveraging technology and optimising the administrative structure today the cost of collection is 6 paise per rupee
• The tax slabs were reduces encouraging more peole to pay taxes. As a result the direct taxes have increased and are today almost equal to indirect tax revenues
• The cascading effect of taxes on industry was corrected by implementing the advolarem taxation system through VAT
So what next?
The next step is to simplify our tax laws. The IT act of 1961 has become voluminous and is not in sync with current demands of economy.
Hence the government is undertaking GST and DTC to put in place a simplified, transparent tax system.
A transparent tax system will lead to a situtation where people would start voluntarily filing tax leading to surplus revenue with govt which could be benefeicially invested in social sector schemes. This would help in achieveing our goal of financial inclusion. It would encourgae people to save more leading to higher svaings rate and hence promoting investments. This would lead to a greta thrust to our economy and will jettision us into the league of developed nations.
So the need of the hour is a swift and smooth passing of DTC and GST bill

Sunday, September 5, 2010

India's growth: Its problems and solution

Indian economy has been growing at a rapid pace for the past 5 years barring the slow down during the crisis year. The main driver of this growth has been our service sector and the burgeoning foreign reserves thanks to the FDIs and FIIs flowing into India
The growth rate of any economy is measured in terms of increase in gross domestic product (GDP) in a given time period. GDP is the net value of all goods and services produced within a country in a given time period.
Indian economy is broadly divided into 3 sectors
i) Agriculture sector
ii) Industrial sector
iii) Service sector
Agriculture sector:
It employs 60% of our workforce. However it’s contribution to GDP is disproportionately low. Hence the fruits of growth and development don’t reach these 60%. Efforts need to be made to boost agriculture sector as india is mainly an agrarian economy. India is bestowed with large land area criss crossing with rivers and streams. Optimum utilisation of resources can lead to maximising yield and hence more money in the pockets of the farmers. Micro watershed management needs to be taken up on a priority basis especially in drought prone regions. Scientific agriculture should be adopted. Research findings need to be implemented. All these measures along with a holistic developemnt of key social sector areas can lead to a sustainable and higher growth of our agriculture sector
Industry sector:
We have the advantage of a huge population and this can serve as a huge demographic dividend for our country. But the lack of skill among majority of work force is an area of concern. In this land of a billion, employment is never a problem but lack of employable skills denies many a denizens the right to lead a dignified and prosperous life. Every year an estimated 15 million workforce enter the job market. But our institutions can train only a 3 million workforce. This is an area of concern.
Our industrial sector has attracted large foreign investments. Indian industry offers the following advantages
i) Cheap labour
ii) Cheap raw material
iii) Big and diverse market
However there is lot of scope to increase foreign investment in our industries. There are certain bottlenecks which need to be removed. They are
i) Obselete and stringent labour laws
ii) Inefficient banking system
iii) Overstressed physical infrastructure
Labour laws need to be amended to provide for easy shutting down of industries. Our banking systems are slow interms of verification and approval loans. Our ports are painstakingly slow in unloading and laoding, our roads are crowded and our power supply is frequently interrupted. The golden quadrilateral has adressed the problem of roads to some extent. But freight movement is mostly through railways . Railways need to implement the freight corridor project at war footing in order to not deny india the opportuniy to grow at over 10%. Our power stations are unable to meet the growing needs of differen sectors. The give away schemes of govt towards agriculture have resulted in disproportionate(over 80%) consumption of power in agriculture sector.
Power supply systems are easily tamperable and are hence prone to leakages. Measures need to be taken to ensure optimum utilisation of our power resources.
Services Sector:
Services sector employs around 20% of our work force and contributes to over 60% of our GDP. Services like Software, Hotels , Tourism have helped in boosting india’s image at international level. In the crisis period Software exports and worker remittances kept us afloat and ensured india was among the handful countires that showed a positive growth. Improvements in communication technology has helped in sectors like BPO to flourish. India has excelled in field of software while china is leader in hardware. A harmonious partnership between the two asian giants can ensure a boost in foreign trade.
Despite delivering a positive growth rate , we still arent able to put money into the hands of poor. The reason for this is the unbalanced regional development. Over 50% of FDI is concentrated in Mumbai and Delhi. This is majorly because of the infrastructure and transport facilities in these regions. With such high disparities it is difficult to achieve inclusive growth. Innovative concepts like rural BPOs need to be encouraged to deliver the fruits of India’s growth in the hinterlands.

Sunday, July 25, 2010

PUB AD:Leader Vs Manager

Leadership vs Manager
A leader is a person who inspires people in a desired direction. He sets the vision for an organization and initiates change. He aligns people and empowers them to achieve the goals. He is more informal in behavior. A leader has stylistic gift of grace and enjoys power
A manager gets things done. He helps in achieving the vision by monitoring and controlling the employees. He plans the path towards achieving the goals. He has a status and authority.
In an organization, both leader and manager strive towards the same goals. But their style of functioning is different. A leader achieves the goals by empowering the people while a manager achieves by monitoring and controlling people. A manager is directly involved at the field level in achieving the goals while leader is indirectly involved. The common functions of leader and manager are

a) Decision making
b) Human relation
c) Achieving vision
A leader performs decision making by setting a vision while a manager does so by planning and budgeting.
A leader has a informal relationship with his followers and inspires them to achieve the goals while Manager has a formal relationship with subordinates and organizes and staffs them
A leader achieving the vision by communicating the vision while manager strives to achieve vision by monitoring and controlling the subordinates.
A manager is wary of creation of power centres. Hence he monitors and controls subordinates after delegating authority to them.
For optimal effectiveness of an organization , both leaders and managers are essential.

Monday, July 12, 2010

CENTRE state relations

Our constitution is federal. Hence it provides for separation in powers. But judicial powers are not separated. As they wanted a single integrated judiciary to enforce centre and state laws.
Rest of the powers ie administrative,legislative and financial powers are bifurcated
LEGISLATIVE POWERS:
Art 245-255
The legislative powers are divided into 3 lists
Union , State and concurrent lists
Legislation on union subjects only by parliament
Legislation on state subjects only by state and under exceptional circumstance by parliament
Legislation on concurrent subjects by state and parliament with parliament getting higher priority
The exceptions under which parliament can legislate in state are
• When rajyasabha says so
• When two states request
• During national emergency
• During prez rule
• To implement international treaties and agreements
Also the centre can take control of state legislature when
• When governor reserves
• When prez asks to reserve
• Certain state subjects like restrictions on freedom of state and commerce
EXECUTIVE POWERS:
Executive powers are divided on same lines as legislative powers.
So Executive power of centre is on matters related to subjects in union list and any other matter that arises out of international agreements
Executive power of state is on subjects in state and concurrent list.
Hence laws on concurrent subject are made by centre and executed by state
The state must exercise power in such a way that
1. it is in line with laws of parliament and state
2. The centre’s executive power is not impeded
If the centre’s orders aren’t complied with, then centre can take coercive action against state under art 365 and impose prez rule(356)
The cntre gives suggestion/directions in matters of
1. Establishing and maintaining communication
2. Protection of railways in the state
3. Ensuring education in local language till primary stage
4. Drawing up schemes for welfare of ST in state
Unlike the division of powers of legislative powers which is rigid, in case of executive powers is flexible.
Mutual delegation of executive powers is possible
Prez can delegate centres executive power to state with consent of state
Parliament can also by law confer an executive power on a subject in union list to state.
A governor of state can delegate any of the executive functions of state onto centre with centre’s consent
Hence a centre can delegate its executive powers to state by consent or legislation while a state can delegate its powers to centre oly by consent

Sunday, July 4, 2010

Primate Evolution


The geologists divided the periods of earth into 4 eras. They are

1. Azoic era(4500-3500 mya)-No life

2. Protozoic(3500-600 mya)-Unicellular

3. Paleozoic(600-230 mya)-Piesces,Amphibians,Primitive Reptiles

· Cambrian period

· Ordovician

· Silurium

· Devonian

· Carbiniferous

· Permean

4. Mesozoic(230-65 mya)

· Triassic

· Jurassic

· Cretaceous(135 mya)-Purgatorius evolved(75 mya)

5. Cenozoic(65 my onwards)

Ă˜ Teritiary period

· Palaeocene(65-54 mya)-Archaic primates-

· Eocene(54-36 mya)-True primates-

· Oligocene(36-23 mya)-New and Old world Monkeys

· Miocene(23-5 mya)-Dryopithecus,Dendropithecus-16 mya,Ramapithecus(adapted to terrestrial as well)-10 mya

· Pliocene(5-2 mya)-Giant apes in china and india-gigantopithecines

Ă˜ Quarternary Period

· Pleistocene(2m-10kya)-Homonid evolution-australopithecus to Homo sapien sapiens

· Holocene(10k-present)

Pliocene-Plesiadapis, Purgatorius, navajovius, Carbolestis, Plesiolestis

Eocene-Adapis,Necrolemus,Omyms,Smilodectus,Notharctus

Oligocene-New world and old world monkeys,fossils at fayum beds,Egypt,South America and eastern Africa